Roscomos will not revive Buran
 |
 |
During a meeting for the inauguration of a school, director of Roscomos, A.N. Perminov confirmed that there is no plans to revive the Buran project, nor develop a reusable system, at least like the Buran/Shuttle.
In accordance to the president of Roscosmos there is no plan to develop a reusable transport system even if the idea is interesting and it is necessary to continue researches in this field. But the way it was done on Buran and on the American Shuttle is detrimental because it implies important using costs and it is not secure.
The main point is the economical aspect, the cost of a launch of the American Shuttle is up to 0.5 billion of dollars, this is a lot of money even for a country like the United States.
The second point is about security, this spacecraft is not reliable at 100%, two accidents on the Shuttle showed it. Despite the hight level of design of Buran and the Shuttle, this is the same for Buran. This way has no advantage and is hazardous.
Ещё на один Ð²Ð¾Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ Ð¾Ñ‚Ð²ÐµÑ‚Ð¸Ð» Ð.Ð. Перминов – о «Буране»: «Ðет ли ÑÐµÐ³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð¿Ð»Ð°Ð½Ð¾Ð² Ð²Ð¾Ð·Ñ€Ð¾Ð¶Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñтого проекта или каких-то других проектов ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ñ… пилотируемых коÑмичеÑких кораблей?»
«Ðе хотелоÑÑŒ Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ñ€Ñ‡Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ, но лучше Ñразу Ñказать: нет, не планируем. Ð˜Ð´ÐµÑ ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ñ… коÑмичеÑких кораблей Ñама по Ñебе Ñ…Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾ÑˆÐ°Ñ Ð¸ будет иÑпользована дальше однозначно. Ðо как она была иÑполнена и на «Буране», и на американÑких шаттлах, она оказалаÑÑŒ невыгодной из-за выÑокой ÑтоимоÑти обÑÐ»ÑƒÐ¶Ð¸Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ ненадёжноÑти.
Во-первых: ÑкономичеÑкий аÑпект. СтоимоÑÑ‚ÑŒ запуÑка одного шаттла обходитÑÑ ÐÐСРдо 0,5 млрд долларов. Ðто очень много даже Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ‚Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ Ñтраны, как Ðмерика.
Во-вторых: надёжноÑÑ‚ÑŒ. Пока ещё не обеÑпечена 100-Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ†ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð´Ñ‘Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ кораблей многоразового иÑпользованиÑ, и 2 ÑÐ»ÑƒÑ‡Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ°Ñ‚Ð°Ñтроф Ñ ÑˆÐ°Ñ‚Ñ‚Ð»Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ тому ÑвидетельÑтво. ÐеÑÐ¼Ð¾Ñ‚Ñ€Ñ Ð½Ð° Ð¾Ñ‚Ð»Ð¸Ñ‡Ð¸Ñ Ð² Ñхеме компоновки «Бурана» и шаттлов, вÑÑ‘ оÑтальное на «Буране» то же Ñамое – те же недоÑтатки. Ðто направление оказалоÑÑŒ невыгодным и опаÑным.
Posted on:
2010-07-07 under
Buran, Energia.
3 comments
»
Articles that can interest you :
Comments
|
Comment
from
КОЛОВРÐТ
|
ÐЕ ХОЧЕШЬ ПЕРМИÐОВ СТРОИТЬ БУРÐРТОГДРСТРОЙ МОЛÐИЮ ИЛИ КЛИПЕРВЫБИВÐЙ ДЕÐЬГИ ИЗ ЛИБЕРÐСТОВ ПОДОÐКОВ……!!!!!!!
|
Comment
from
Caio lima caldas
|
This is a fucking shit !!!!
Comment from Krys
Time: 2010-11-02, 12.34
Truly a lack of vision on the parts of Roscosmos, in my view. The Soyuz system is excellent. Reliable, affordable and gets the job done, but there is a need for a replacement that can combine passenger and cargo launches, and handle greater volumes of both. So many « Soyuz replacement » designs have come and gone, whilst the Buran design is there. A complete design, with the core elements already having undergone a huge amount of testing.
Furthermore, 20 years down the road there is now a wealth of information and experience gained from the NASA shuttle program that give us the benefit of hindsight that can be applied to a Buran revival.
At the end of the day, if the government is serious about taking back the Russian ISS modules at the end of the ISS program, then it will need a vessel to develop, supply, crew and maintain them, and actually make the whole thing worthwhile. And by then, if Soyuz was human, it’d be almost ready to collect a pension.