Commentaires sur : Roscomos ne fera pas renaître le projet Bourane http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/2010/07/07/roscomos-will-not-revive-buran/ Nouvelles sur le site et le projet Bourane-Energia Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:26:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 Par : Caio lima caldas http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/2010/07/07/roscomos-will-not-revive-buran/comment-page-1/#comment-3279 Caio lima caldas Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:08:00 +0000 http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/?p=1246#comment-3279 This is a fucking shit !!!! This is a fucking shit !!!!

]]> Par : КОЛОВРАТ http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/2010/07/07/roscomos-will-not-revive-buran/comment-page-1/#comment-2855 КОЛОВРАТ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:04:00 +0000 http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/?p=1246#comment-2855 НЕ ХОЧЕШЬ ПЕРМИНОВ СТРОИТЬ БУРАН ТОГДА СТРОЙ МОЛНИЮ ИЛИ КЛИПЕР ВЫБИВАЙ ДЕНЬГИ ИЗ ЛИБЕРАСТОВ ПОДОНКОВ......!!!!!!! НЕ ХОЧЕШЬ ПЕРМИНОВ СТРОИТЬ БУРАН ТОГДА СТРОЙ МОЛНИЮ ИЛИ КЛИПЕР ВЫБИВАЙ ДЕНЬГИ ИЗ ЛИБЕРАСТОВ ПОДОНКОВ……!!!!!!!

]]> Par : Krys http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/2010/07/07/roscomos-will-not-revive-buran/comment-page-1/#comment-2851 Krys Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:34:00 +0000 http://www.buran-energia.com/blog/?p=1246#comment-2851 Truly a lack of vision on the parts of Roscosmos, in my view. The Soyuz system is excellent. Reliable, affordable and gets the job done, but there is a need for a replacement that can combine passenger and cargo launches, and handle greater volumes of both. So many "Soyuz replacement" designs have come and gone, whilst the Buran design is there. A complete design, with the core elements already having undergone a huge amount of testing. Furthermore, 20 years down the road there is now a wealth of information and experience gained from the NASA shuttle program that give us the benefit of hindsight that can be applied to a Buran revival. At the end of the day, if the government is serious about taking back the Russian ISS modules at the end of the ISS program, then it will need a vessel to develop, supply, crew and maintain them, and actually make the whole thing worthwhile. And by then, if Soyuz was human, it'd be almost ready to collect a pension. Truly a lack of vision on the parts of Roscosmos, in my view. The Soyuz system is excellent. Reliable, affordable and gets the job done, but there is a need for a replacement that can combine passenger and cargo launches, and handle greater volumes of both. So many « Soyuz replacement » designs have come and gone, whilst the Buran design is there. A complete design, with the core elements already having undergone a huge amount of testing.

Furthermore, 20 years down the road there is now a wealth of information and experience gained from the NASA shuttle program that give us the benefit of hindsight that can be applied to a Buran revival.

At the end of the day, if the government is serious about taking back the Russian ISS modules at the end of the ISS program, then it will need a vessel to develop, supply, crew and maintain them, and actually make the whole thing worthwhile. And by then, if Soyuz was human, it’d be almost ready to collect a pension.

]]>